(Photo Credit: renjith krishnan/freedigitalphotos.net)
A female professor, who goes only by the initial W., received a job offer from a college, identified as an "SLAC-Nazareth College" by The Philosophy Smoker, a blog that quoted both her letter and the college's response. The blogger, who appears to also be in academia, noted that her requests were "fairly standard deal-sweeteners."
As you know, I am very enthusiastic about the possibility of coming to Nazareth. Granting some of the following provisions would make my decision easier.
1) An increase of my starting salary to $65,000, which is more in line with what assistant professors in philosophy have been getting in the last few years.
2) An official semester of maternity leave.
3) A pre-tenure sabbatical at some point during the bottom half of my tenure clock.
4) No more than three new class preps per year for the first three years.
5) A start date of academic year 2015 so I can complete my postdoc.
I know that some of these might be easier to grant than others. Let me know what you think.
The college's response:
Thank you for your email. The search committee discussed your provisions. They were also reviewed by the Dean and the VPAA. It was determined that on the whole these provisions indicate an interest in teaching at a research university and not at a college, like ours, that is both teaching and student centered. Thus, the institution has decided to withdraw its offer of employment to you.
Thank you very much for your interest in Nazareth College. We wish you the best in finding a suitable position.
That's right: on the face of things, it appears that the professor attempted to negotiate, and that attempt resulted in the college rescinding on its offer of employment.
Before we jump entirely to conclusions, however, it's worth taking a look at the comments on Jezebel's coverage of this story, particularly those that note that "minimal class time is a hallmark of research universities," and that the professor asked for a raise and four perks, something that might not be standard for the culture of the prospective employer.
Still, the college's response seems problematic for several reasons:
1. W's requests were just that -- asks, not demands. If candidates aren't allowed to ask for what they want before accepting a job, when are they allowed to? To say that offers of employment should be conditional on not attempting to negotiate for anything seems unreasonable.
2. One of W's requests pertained to maternity leave. Even though the college didn't mention that particular request in its response, it seems risky, on their part, to leave themselves open to the accusation that they discriminated against a candidate based on her future childbearing choices.
3. It's hard to picture a man being rejected for attempting to negotiate a job offer, but even if we give the college the benefit of the doubt on that one, their response at least betrays an academic culture that expects its junior faculty to take what they get.
Regardless of the tough employment environment in academia, this seems like a lousy way to start a job. Maybe, in fact, the college did W. a favor.
Tell Us What You Think
Do you think that W. asked for too much, or is negotiating a job offer always a reasonable idea? We want to hear from you! Leave a comment or join the discussion on Twitter.