Pay transparency by country
This page is a reference resource and is updated as legislation evolves. For guidance on your specific obligations, please consult qualified legal counsel.
United States
| State | Current pay transparency legislation | Upcoming changes | Who must comply? | Penalties | Effective date | Salary history ban? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alabama | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Limited; retaliation prohibited against workers who decline to share salary history information with a prospective employer |
California | Employers must disclose the good faith salary/hourly range in all job postings. Laws also apply to third-party job posters. | Changes coming to penalties on January 1, 2027 | Employers with 15 or more employees with at least one working in California. Also applies to general remote work postings. | Between $100–$10,000 per violation | In effect | Yes |
Colorado | Employers must disclose salary ranges and a general description of benefits must be included in all job postings, including promotional opportunities. | If an employer is physically located outside of Colorado and has fewer than 15 remote employees in Colorado, the employer is only required to provide notice of remote job opportunities until July 1, 2029. | Employers with at least one employee working in Colorado. Also applies to general remote work postings. | Between $500–$10,000 per violation | In effect | Yes |
Connecticut | Salary ranges must be provided upon candidate request or at offer (whichever is sooner). | October 1, 2026: salary ranges and benefits need to be in every job posting. The definition of “benefits” includes health insurance, retirement, paid leave, and any additional fringe benefits. | All employers | Employees and applicants may bring a private cause of action. | In effect | Yes |
Delaware | N/A | September 26, 2027: employers will be required to post salary ranges plus benefits in all job postings | Employers with 26+ employees, which includes jobs based in Delaware and remote roles from Delaware-based employers | First offense: warning; then fines between $500-$10,000 | September 26, 2027 | Yes |
Georgia | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Limited to city agencies in Atlanta only |
Hawaii | Employers must post the hourly rate or salary range that reasonably reflects the actual expected compensation. | N/A | Employers with 50 or more employees | N/A | In effect | Yes |
Illinois | Employers must post salary ranges and a general description of benefits and other compensation in job postings. | N/A | Employers with 15 or more employees, but the requirement only applies where: (i) the job will be performed (at least in part) in Illinois or (ii) the employee will report to a supervisor or office in Illinois | $500 for first violation (14 days to cure violation); $2,500 for second violation (7 days to cure violation); $10,000 for subsequent violations (no cure period) | In effect | Yes |
Kentucky | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Limited to Louisville-Jefferson Country Metro Government |
Louisiana | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Limited to city of New Orleans agencies |
Maine | Salary ranges required in job postings and need to maintain records of employees pay histories during employment and for three years after termination | N/A | Employers with 10 or more employees | N/A | In effect | Yes |
Maryland | Employers must post the minimum and maximum hourly/salary range set in good faith in all job postings (internal/external) as well as a general description of benefits and any other compensation offered. | N/A | Employers posting a job that will be performed (at least in part) in Maryland or that reports to a supervisor/job site/office in Maryland). Will likely also apply to general remote work postings. | Warning for first violation, $300/employee or applicant for second violation, and $600/employee or applicant for subsequent violations. | In effect | Yes |
Massachusetts | Employers must post the salary/hourly range that the employer, in good faith, expects to pay for a role (internal/external postings), and must also provide pay range for the role to the employee holding that position | N/A | Employers with 25 or more employees in Massachusetts (not including state/local government employees) | Warning for first offense, fine not more than $500 for second offense, and penalties increase for third offense | In effect | Yes |
Michigan | N/A | Proposed salary history ban | Michigan employers | N/A | TBD | Limited; state departments cannot ask about salary history until after an offer has been extended |
Minnesota | Employers must provide the minimum to maximum hourly/salary range and a general description of benefit | N/A | Employers with 30 or more employees in Minnesota | Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry and the Minnesota Attorney General have the authority to investigate and enforce the law | In effect | Yes |
Mississippi | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Limited to city of Jackson employers |
Missouri | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Limited to public employers and privateemployers with 6+ employees in Kansas City; and St Louis City public employers |
Nevada | Employers must provide salary information after first interview. | N/A | Nevada employers | N/A | In effect | Yes |
New Jersey | Employers must post salary ranges in job postings and for internal transfers/promotions, plus a general description of benefits | N/A | Employers with 10 or more employees over 20 calendar weeks of the year who do business, employ persons, or take applications for employment within New Jersey. Will likely also apply to general remote work. | $300 for first violation, $600 for each subsequent violations | In effect | Yes |
New York State | Employers must post the minimum to maximum annual salary/hourly range that they, in good faith, believe they will pay for roles to be performed in NY state or roles that report to a supervisor/worksite in NY state. They must include a job description (if one exists). This also applies to promotion and transfer opportunities. | N/A | Employers with four or more employees | Up to $1,000 for first violation, up to $2,000 for second violation, and up to $3,000 for third and subsequent violations | In effect | Yes |
New York (NYC) | Salary ranges must be posted in all jobs and promotions for roles that can be performed in NYC. | N/A | Employers with four or more employees, with at least one working in NYC. Also applies to general remote work postings. | Penalties up to $250,000 by the NYCCHR and lawsuit fees/costs | In effect | Yes, and as a part of statewide ban |
New York (Ithaca) | Salary ranges must be included in job postings. | N/A | Employers with four or more employees | N/A | In effect | Yes, and as a part of statewide ban |
New York (Westchester County) | Salary ranges must be included in job postings. | N/A | Any employer posting a job performed in or that can be performed in Westchester | N/A | In effect | Yes, and as a part of statewide ban |
North Carolina | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | State agencies only |
Ohio (Cincinnati, Columbus, and Toledo only) | Salary information must be provided upon request or after conditional offer of employment is made (whichever is sooner). | Enforcement in Columbus delayed until January 1,2027 | Employers with 15 or more employees | Private right of action only | In effect | Cincinnati: employers with 15 or more employees, including the City of Cincinnati as public employer but excluding other state and local governments. Columbus: employers with 15 or more employees, including the City of Columbus as public employer but excluding other state and local governments. Toledo: employers with 15 or more employees, including the City of Toledo as public employer. |
Ohio (Cleveland) | Employers must provide the salary range or scale in any notification, advertisement, or other job posting. | N/A | Private employes with at least 15 people within Cleveland | Civil penalties up to $5,000 | In effect | Yes |
Oregon | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes |
Pennsylvania | N/A | Proposed bill would require employers to provide pay ranges and the factors used to determine these ranges to applicants and employees seeking internal transfers/promotions. If the pay range isn't established, employers must disclose the minimum wage or salary before posting the job or offering the transfer. | N/A | N/A | N/A | Limited to local bans: City of Philadelphia employers; City of Pittsburgh employees; all employers in Lehigh County |
Rhode Island | Salary information must be provided upon candidate request and/or prior to discussing compensation, whichever occurs first. During employment, the employer must provide the wage range for an employee’s position upon transfer to that position and upon request. | N/A | Rhode Island employers | N/A | In effect | Yes |
South Carolina | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Limited to local bans: City of Columbia employees; Richland County employees |
Utah | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Limited to local ban: Salt Lake City employees |
Vermont | Employers are required to post the minimum and maximum hourly/salary range that they, in good faith, believe they will pay for a role. This applies to both internal and external job postings. Current employees also have the right to ask for a salary range applicable to their current position. Employers must also disclose if the role is paid partly by tips/commissions. | N/A | Any employer with 5 or more employees posting a job performed in Vermont or a remote position that will be predominantly performed in an office or worksite in Vermont. | N/A | In effect | Yes |
Virginia | Employers are required to post a salary range for each role, including promotions and transfer. | N/A | All employers | $1,000 for first violation and up to $5,000 for any subsequent violation | In effect | Yes |
Washington State | Salary range and general description of benefits must be included in job postings. Salary range information must also be provided to employees changing roles, if requested. | N/A | Employers with 15 or more employees | Civil actions for violations, greater of actual damages or $5,000 plus interest, costs, and reasonable attorney's fees. Civil penalties ranging from $500–$1,000 per violation. | In effect | Yes |
Washington, D.C. | Employers must post the minimum to maximum salary/hourly range that they, in good faith, believe they will pay for a role (includes promotions and transfers). Employers must also disclose the existence of healthcare benefits before the first interview. | N/A | Employers with at least one employee working in Washington, D.C. (not including Federal/District employees). | Civil fine of $1,000 for the first violation,$5,000 for the second violation, and $20,000 for each subsequent violation. | In effect | Yes |
*Employers who are hiring general remote work, must comply with this law if they have at least the minimum number of employees nationwide and 1 employee working in that state
European Union
| Member State | Directive transposition status | Who? | What? | When? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Austria | No draft published | TBD | TBD | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Belgium | FWB decree in force since 1 Jan 2025 (public sector). Federal bill pending. | French Community public sector employers. Federal scope TBD. | Salary range disclosure; salary history ban; pay gap reporting. Federal: scope still being defined. | FWB: In effect. Federal: Have requested a six-month delay |
Bulgaria | Draft published on 19 May. Consultation until 18 June so will be delayed | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Amendment to Protection against Discrimination Law. Clean transposition of the Directive. | No date yet but will be delayed as consultation doesn't finish until 17 June 2026 |
Croatia | No legislation yet. MROSP's 2026 legislative plan includes Labour Act amendments to transpose the Directive. | TBD | TBD. Labour Act amendments planned. | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Cyprus | Draft published for consultation (closed 4 Dec 2025) | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Clean transposition on obligations. | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Czech Republic | Act 120/2025 Sb. in force 1 Jun 2025. Further draft published 27 Mar 2026. Confirmed delay until 1 Jan 2027 | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Ban on pay secrecy clauses already in force. Full transposition to include mandatory remuneration systems; expanded Ombudsman role; inclusion of agency workers. | Pay secrecy ban: in effect. Full provisions: 1 Jan 2027. Reporting and Right to Information: 1 Jan 2028. |
Denmark | Draft bill amending Equal Pay Act published 26 Feb 2026. Parliamentary work suspended due to elections. | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers Reporting requirements: 50+ phased implementation | Full transposition. New centralized oversight body (Danish Labour Market Institute for Equal Pay). Compensation right even for information-obligation breaches. | 1 Jan 2027 (confirmed delay). First reporting for 150+ employers: September 2028. |
Estonia | Have passed a bill covering candidate transparency only. No further draft published. Have asked for 2-year postponement but have been refused. | Candidate transparency: All employers | Ban on salary history and pay secrecy clauses. Salary ranges to be provided to candidates before interview. | July 2026: candidate transparency Remainder is delayed |
Finland | Draft presented to Parliament with proposed implementation date of 1 January 2027 | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation Existing 30+ threshold retained for current pay survey requirements | Clean transposition on obligations. Existing pay survey obligations continue alongside new requirements. | Expected to begin in 2027 |
France | Second draft released in June 2026 | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 50+ phased implementation | Significant gold-plating: pay ranges in job ads; seven reporting indicators replace existing Professional Equality Index; Clear definition of criteria for categorisation. | Expected to begin in 2027 with phased implementation |
Germany | No legislation yet. Commission final report published 7 Nov 2025. No draft bill. | TBD | TBD | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Greece | Signed into law on 6 July 2026. Obligations come into effect on 1 November 2026. | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Mainly clean transposition on obligations. Pay structures are also included in the transparency requirements. Candidate transparency before interview, not in job adverts. | Definitions and setting up of institutions: 6 July 2026 Operational requirements: 1 November 2026 First reporting: June 2027 for companies 150+ |
Hungary | No draft published. New Parliament so not expected yet. | TBD | TBD | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Ireland | Draft for candidate transparency published Jan 2025 but no dates for implementation. Phased implementation of rest of Directive confirmed but no dates. | TBD | TBD | Confirmed to be phased, post-June 2026. |
Italy | Decree approved on 30 April 2026 and made available on 1 June 2026 | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 50+ phased implementation | Salary range in job notices (stricter than Directive — gold-plating); CBA classifications recommended; Right to Information only once per year | 7 June 2026 |
Latvia | Draft legislation out but still working on final draft. | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Clean transposition on obligations. | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Lithuania | Law XV-969 adopted on 21 May 2026 | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation. | Centralised reporting, with employers providing data monthly; Right to Information requests to be answered within 1 month. | 7 June 2026: most elements, although you have until the end of the year to finalize your remuneration system. 1 Jan 2027: Right to Information and Reporting begin. |
Luxembourg | No draft published. | TBD | TBD | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Malta | Candidate transparency: L.N. 112 of 2025 in force since 27 Aug 2025 Remaining transposition: L.N. 173 of 2026 enacted on 7 June 2026 | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. However, all employers over 25 must have internal documentation. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Clean transposition on obligations. Right to Information requests to be answered within 8 days. | Candidate transparency: In effect (Aug 2025). Remaining requirements: Came into effect on 7 June 2026 |
Netherlands | Final draft published 19 May. Will be delayed until 1 Jan 2027 | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Clean transposition on obligations. Transparency more important than privacy for reporting and Right to Information. | 1 January 2027 |
Poland | Candidate transparency: Labour Code amendments in force 24 Dec 2025. Remaining requirements: Second draft published 4 May 2026. | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Clean transposition on obligations. More detail than most drafts so far. Right to Information requests based on rolling 12 months, with 1 month to respond. | Candidate transparency: In effect (Dec 2025). Remaining requirements: targeting 7 Jun 2026 but with six month delay before coming into force. |
Portugal | Draft published on 5 August 2026. Will come into force on the first day of the month following its passing through Parliament. | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 50+ phased implementation | Clean transposition in agreement with worker representatives, if they exist. | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Romania | Accelerated process for the draft has been approved. News expected in September. | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Procedural gold-plating proposed: 30 working-day response deadline; dedicated remuneration system; ranges on job adverts | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Slovakia | Law passed on 15 April 2026. First country to fully transpose the Directive. | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation | Clean transposition with a few date changes: remuneration is calendar year so Right to Information with category averages does not begin until 2028; reporting begins in 2027 but only for 1 Aug to 31 Dec 2026. | 7 June 2026 |
Slovenia | No draft published. | TBD | TBD | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Spain | Draft published on 3 August with a short consultation period. Will come into force immediately after passing. | Candidate transparency requirements: Not mentioned in draft Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 50+ phased implementation | Amendment to current laws so significant changes to the Directive. Candidate transparency not mentioned in the draft. Right to information allowed once per year. | Deadline was 7 June so is late. No date known. |
Sweden | Draft published in 2025. Government announced Mar 2026 that it will delay and wants to renegotiate. | Candidate transparency requirements: All employers Employee transparency requirements: All employers. Employers under 50 exempt from pay progression obligations. Reporting requirements: 100+ phased implementation Current 'pay survey' requirements will continue alongside Directive requirements | Clean transposition on obligations. | Delayed indefinitely |
Canada
| Province | Current pay transparency legislation requirement | Future requirement | Who must comply? | Penalties | Effective date | Salary history ban? | Pay reporting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alberta | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | No |
British Columbia | Salary or wage information must be included on all publicly advertised job postings. Employers don’t need to include bonus pay, overtime, commissions, tips, or other benefits. | N/A | Provincially regulated employers | N/A | In effect | Yes | Pay Transparency reports through the B.C. Pay Transparency Reporting Tool. Gender pay gaps will be made public. |
Manitoba | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | No |
New Brunswick | Pay Tranparency Act requires salary ranges in job postings, bans salary history inquiries, and creates phased pay reporting for employers with 50+ employee starting with public sector in 2028 | N/A | Applies to all employers and employees subject to NB legislative authority, including the Crown. No size threshold for job posting and salary history provisions. | Fine for non-compliance | June 12, 2026 | Yes | Phased: Public Service in 2028, 100+ employers in 2029, 50+ employees in 2030 |
Newfoundland and Labrador | N/A | Requires private employers to include pay or pay range in all job postings. Enforcement date TBD, waiting on proclamation by Lieutenant-Governor in Council. | All employers | Fine of not more than $25,000 for corporations. | TBD | Passed on April 1, 2023, waiting on proclamation for effective date | Passed on April 1, 2023, waiting on proclamation for effective date |
Northwestern Territories | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | No |
Nova Scotia | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | Yes | No |
Nunavut | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | No |
Ontario | Employers must include the expected compensation, or range of compensation, in publicly advertised job postings. Ranges cannot exceed $50,000. | N/A | Employers with 25+ employees, who publicly advertises a job posting with expected compensation is less than $200,000 per year. | Up to $10,000 | In effect | Yes | Proposal (not in force): Ontario's Pay Transparency Act, 2018 (SO 2018, c. 5) does contain provisions for annual pay transparency reports. However this has never been brought into force. |
Prince Edward Island | Employers must include a proposed salary or salary range in job postings | N/A | Prince Edward Island employers | Fine not less than $200 and not more than $10,000 | June 1, 2022 | Yes | No |
Quebec | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | Yes |
Saskatchewan | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | No |
Yukon | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | No | No |
Featured Webinars
Your salary negotiation playbook for the pay transparency era
Negotiating job offers has evolved in the age of pay transparency. Job candidates are discussing pay ranges posted to job ads. Expectations have changed. Make sure you're prepared.
Download the guide
Are you prepared for upcoming pay transparency legislation?
Learn how Payscale compensation data, technology and services can assist you on your journey towards increased pay transparency and fairness.
The ID is set to default '5900', don't forget to update it if needed.





